Rabbi Judah ha-Nasi (latter half of the second and beginning of the third century C.E.), considered to be the redactor of the Codification of basic Jewish Oral Law; edited and arranged by R. Judah ha-Nasi c. 200 C.E. Mishnah , made a statement that started a trend of legal development resulting in the elimination of the category of normal menstruation and its replacement by the category of abnormal bleeding, ziva. His statement reflects the possible confusion in keeping track of one’s period, especially in light of the new system of pithei niddah. If this was done intentionally, the couple incurred the punishment of karet; if done unintentionally, they were obligated to bring a sin offering. Atonement by sacrifice, however, could not be made after the destruction of the Temple in the year 70 C.E. Great efforts were therefore made to prevent inadvertent sins of this nature. BT Niddah 66a gives us Rabbi’s statement: “R. Joseph citing Rav Judah who had it from Rav stated: Rabbi ordained at Sadot: If a woman observed a discharge on one day she must wait six days in addition to it. If she observed discharges on two days she must wait six days in addition to these. If she observed a discharge on three days she must wait seven clean days.”

Amoraim couldn’t disagreement tannaitic rulings as opposed to tannaitic assistance even so they created fences within the Torah to end inadvertent sins

That it report of the Rabbi Judah ha-Nasi essentially got rid of all the menstruating girls about regular monthly period classification and placed them about abnormal condition from zava since most regular periods past at least three days. Apparently their question was one because of the cutting-edge clarifications needed seriously to decide when one is niddah just in case one may feel an effective zava, that might started to go awry having grievous consequences. First the brand new decree got restricted impression; it looks for come local, and may even was indeed simply for times when doubt was in it while the regional society wasn’t sufficiently learned to choose into the instance factors ( Rabbi Solomon ben Isaac; b. Indeed it wasn’t an over-all decree for everybody out-of Israel, nonetheless it is step one because advice. In the first a couple of instances, Rabbi’s declaration works together a lady whom may be a minor zava or may be an excellent niddah. The woman is managed in the 1st instance just like the good niddah, having an excellent seven-day age of impurity, in lieu of eventually of impurity throughout the day of hemorrhaging, the rule to own a minor zava. Regarding 2nd example the woman is handled because a niddah and you can a zava when your first-day ended up being in the this lady ziva several months (the latest eleven weeks ranging from menstrual attacks). Regarding the 3rd condition, the woman is managed just like the an entire zava. All of the around three rulings use the a whole lot more strict position.

Troyes, France, 1040 Rashi )

Subsequent statements by other sages make it absolutely certain that it was understood to be a general ent are from the amoraim, the sages who created the Palestinian and Babylonian Talmudim. We find a aic) “spokesman.” Scholars active during the period from the completion of the Mishnah (c. 200 C.E.) until the completion of the Jerusalem and Babylonian Talmuds (end of the fourth and fifth centuries respectively), who were active primarily in the interpretation of the Mishnah. In the chain of tradition they follow the tanna’im and precede the savora’im. amora Rav Huna in JT Berakhot (5:1, 8d): “Rav Huna said: One who sees a drop of blood like [the size of a] mustard seed sits and keeps [because of it] seven clean days. Afterwards he stood to pray.” The statement was made as an example of an undisputed law from which one could then turn to prayer. Such a law would clear one’s mind because there were no arguments about it, thereby allowing one to focus totally on prayer. Rav Huna’s statement is Visit Website much more radical than the tannaitic version quoted above. According to him, all women who see uterine blood are in the category of the complete zava, regardless of the size of the blood stain and despite the normalcy of menstruation or having seen such blood only one or two days.